COMMENTARY
A VIEW FROM THE PEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY
PEANUT GALLERY
WANTED:
MORE PEDIATRIC RESIDENTS IN RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC
I have recently noted that several rheumatology electives
are not attracting as many pediatric residents as they have in the past. Part
of the explanation may lie with the view of the universe of the pediatric
residency director. I know the details of one program where previously the
pediatric program allowed first year residents only to choose between
pulmonary, neurology, and rheumatology for a two week or month block as a first
year resident. A change in residency directors led to the residents freely
choosing their electives. As that residency director’s emphasis and love is
ICU, there appeared to be a built-in bias towards ICU experiences and inpatient
care that appears to come from more what the director does and cares about than
what the director says (modeling that says “inpatient care is where it’s
at!!!”)
So, though that
program director would likely not agree, it appears to me that that particular
residency program emphasized and continues to emphasize more inpatient than
outpatient experience. What outpatient
subspecialty experience there is favors subspecialists who are very conspicuous
in the inpatient setting. To be fair, this inpatient and intensive care
emphasis may have as much to do with the financial and workforce needs of
medical institutions as with educational priorities (If the residents don’t do
the work in intensive care, who would replace them?). Inpatient units that bring in the most money
and publicity may have more power to pull residents into their service. From
this view of the universe, it may be hard to accept the possibility that a
primary care physician and non-NICU/PICU subspecialists need less ICU/NICU (4
months maximum may be sufficient) and more non-hospital care focused outpatient
experience. The residency experience may
meet the necessary residency review committee guidelines but do an inadequate,
or even a poor job of preparing a resident for life as an outpatient physician,
generalist or subspecialty.
I would suggest that
the pediatric resident’s outpatient experience should be as much in specialties
not often visible on the inpatient services (e.g., dermatology, orthopedics,
rheumatology, genetics, sports medicine, development, adolescent medicine,
outpatient infectious disease, chronic disease, physiatry) as in the services
the residents commonly consult for inpatients (pulmonary, cardiology,
hematology-oncology, infectious disease, gastroenterology, endocrine). It is
important to note that one general pediatric practice in
I’m aware that other
pediatric programs may share this problem, but others may have plenty of
residents who rotate through their outpatient elective. If your chairperson is
a rheumatologist or your program director a rheumatologist, you may have
residents in your clinics all the time. Yet I suspect that in many of the
For rheumatology, it’s our challenge to convince residents,
chairpersons, program directors, and others that ours is not just a small
subspecialty of rare diseases. We must repeat our mantras. Six million children
in the world suffer from rheumatic diseases and 250,000 children in the
But we in rheumatology do have a larger image problem, a
profile challenge. We swim upstream against the large numbers of adults with
chronic arthritis, mostly osteoarthritis. No one knows that kid get arthritis
despite efforts by some arthritis organizations. For many laypersons, saying a
child has arthritis is a contradiction, an absurdity, an oxymoron. Our kids
have low grade, low profile chronic illnesses that cause suffering and lower
quality of life, but are not usually life-threatening. So our kid’s problems
just don’t get attention compared to adult arthritis and other childhood
problems. This is a major obstacle. We often have adult rheumatology
organizations do our development and education efforts and these relationships
may hamper our efforts as well. As previously suggested in this commentary
space, it is likely that our needs will never be given adequate emphasis in an
adult arthritis organization.
So we must work on showing our medical community and the
general public that we are an important subspecialty-not more important, but as
important. As I have discussed before, the key may be in demonstrating our
vital role as non-operative musculoskeletal disease specialists. I believe that no one knows the differential
of musculoskeletal problems in children better than an experienced pediatric
rheumatologist-not an orthopedist, not a sports medicine pediatrician, no one. We
have to be assertive in advocating this educational role. We need to show how
important musculoskeletal problems are in resident education.
What strategies should we use?
A) Educate our peers
Our first and toughest obstacle is convincing the Department
Chairperson, the Residency Director, and the
1)10% to 30% of outpatient pediatric visits may involve a
musculoskeletal
complaint.
1-3
2) One survey of pediatricians 10 years out of training
identified
musculoskeletal
training as the weakest area of their pediatric training.4
3) In another study, over 50% of one group of residents and
attending
physicians
were found to be deficient in musculoskeletal knowledge
base
and the ability to do an adequate musculoskeletal exam in adults
and
children.5
4) In one more study, 64 % of referrals to a pediatric
orthopedic practice
by
pediatricians were inappropriate. The authors concluded that the
referrals
indicated either a lack of textbook knowledge or a lack of
examination
skills and the appropriate diagnostic tools. 6
Gaining a sympathetic ear in pediatric administration is
helpful but not required. We should be ready with other ideas if the Director
and Chiefs are not convinced that most of the pediatric residents should be
exposed to outpatient musculoskeletal disorders in children by an outpatient
experience. We should work on the chief residents and residents with other
educational offerings to fill in the gaps and hope that others will eventually
find their way to our clinics.
B) Try new strategies to educate and recruit the pediatric
residents
These
strategies might include:
1)
Broaden the
rheumatology outpatient elective for residents and residents to include
musculoskeletal clinics other than rheumatology: orthopedics, podiatry, sports
medicine, neurology clinic for myopathies, and similar areas.
2)
Begin bedside rounds
once a week with a resident team to demonstrate the physical findings and
discuss the treatment options in a child with JIA, lupus, or JDM.
3)
Attempt to get more
time on rheumatologic and musculoskeletal topics in morning reports, grand
rounds, and core curriculum lectures.
4)
Partner with similar thinking
musculoskeletal physicians including orthopedists, physiatrists, and sports
medicine physicians-share grand rounds, morning reports, core curriculum
lectures, and other opportunities.
5)
Monitor resident
performance on musculoskeletal questions in in-service exams and credentialing
exams-find areas to improve and point out deficiencies.
6)
Inform medical
students and residents about web-based resources such as the ACR and AAP
websites, PROJ, the Indiana University Pediatric Rheumatology Resource website,
individual hospital websites, and other such websites.
7)
Speak with passion to
the residents of the joy of caring for children with chronic musculoskeletal
and rheumatic illnesses and show them your enthusiasm and skills in your time
with them on the wards and in the clinics. Don’t complain.
8)
Make it known that
rheumatology and other areas of autoimmune disease in 2005 are exploding with
new scientific advances and new treatment and that there are many job
opportunities and needs for our skills in many countries.
C) Educate the public
This is a daunting challenge. It
will take several decades. First we educate our peers better and then it will
be easier to educate the layperson. In the meantime, we should use our adult
rheumatology organizations for education and publicity as best we can while
developing our own pediatric rheumatology organizations and foundations for the
long run. No one will do it for us; we must do it on our own. Books and
pamphlets help. Several books have come out that speak to the layperson as
peers and are a tremendous help, including the recently published book “It’s Not Just
Growing Pains”. The most important step may be developing a
fund-raising foundation just for pediatric arthritis diseases, similar to the
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. CARRA and PRINTO may eventually develop
into that fund-raising role.
SUMMARY
The major justification for this effort is the need for
education in musculoskeletal disease of our pediatric workforce in the
Lastly, another critical justification is that this effort
is vital to increasing the number of fellows in pediatric rheumatology and
ultimately having sufficient pediatric rheumatologists in every country in
the world. I applaud the efforts of
the ACR and PRES to bring medical students, residents, and fellows to the
yearly scientific meetings. But the
day-to-day exposure of these young doctors and doctors-to-be to our amazing
rheumatology outpatient world is so important for both medical education and
the recruitment of fellows. We still
have much to do.
Charles
H. Spencer, MD
REFERENCES
1. Craton
N, Matheson GO. Training and clinical competency in
musculoskeletal
medicine. Identifying the problem. Sports Med. 1993:15:
328-337
2. de Inocencio J. Musculoskeletal pain in primary pediatric
care: An analysis
of 1000 consecutive general pediatric clinic visits. Pediatrics.
1998;102(6):E63
3. Schwend RM, Geiger
J. Outpatient pediatric orthopedics: common and
important conditions. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:943-971
4.
Am J Dis Child. 1990;144:1102-1105
5.
in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg. AM 2005 Feb;87-
A(2):310-314
6. Reeder BM, Lyne ED, Patel DR, et al.
Referral patterns to a pediatric
orthopedic clinic: Implications for education and practice.
Pediatrics.
2004;113:e163-e167