TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISEASE IN CHILDREN WITH JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS

 

AUTHORS:

Terry L. Moore, M.D.

Director, Division of Pediatric and Adult Rheumatology

Professor of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics

Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center

 

Didem O. Ince, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.

Former Graduate Student

Graduate Program in Orthodontics

Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center

 

Akgun Ince, M.D.

Associate Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine

Division of Rheumatology

Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center

 

Key Words: TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT, JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS

 

Contact: Terry L. Moore, M.D.

Director, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology

Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center

Room 211A, Doisy Hall

1402 South Grand

St. Louis, MO 63104

Ph#:  (314) 577-8469

Fax#:  (314) 268-5117

E-mail:  mooretl@slu.edu

 

 

Abstract

            Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic, systemic disease of children characterized by chronic synovitis [1]. JIA has been shown to cause inflammation in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and to decrease facial growth, resulting in micrognathia [2].  Figure 1 shows typical TMJ changes seen by panoramic radiography. The frequency of TMJ involvement varies and the subjective, clinical, and radiological findings do not always agree, probably because of differences in methods and patient samples [3-7].  The prevalence of micrognathia in JIA patients ranges from 5-100% [3, 4, 7-8].  Dentofacial morphology of JIA children has, also, been well described in several studies.  Overall, small dimensions of the mandible, posterior rotation of the mandible in relation to the cranial base or a retrognathic mandible, steep mandibular plane, short ramus, obtuse gonial angle, increased antegonial notching, gonial apposition, increased anterior facial convexity, and decreased posterior facial heights are common findings [3,7,8]. 

 

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

It is generally agreed that a healthy TMJ condyle is essential for normal mandibular development [7, 9-10].  However, many investigators believe that the reduction in mandibular function in JIA can also be of etiologic importance [9-10].  Recent studies have been performed to further evaluate the TMJ and mandibular growth alterations in patients with JIA.  Ronchezel et al [3] determined the frequency and type of lesions of the TMJ as well as orthodontic alterations in 26 patients with JIA that they evaluated clinically and by high-resolution computer tomography (CT).  CT detected TMJ alterations in 13 of 26 (50%) of patients with JIA.  Bilateral lesions were the most frequent.  TMJ alterations were especially observed in young patients with JIA with systemic and polyarthritis type of onset who had worse functional class and previous corticosteroid therapy.  They observed orthodontic alterations in 18 patients with JIA (69%), including midline deviation, convex facial profile, Class II molar relation, crowded lower anterior teeth, anterior open bite, and reduction in maximum opening of the mouth [3].  Severe TMJ lesions were correlated to cephalometric alterations, suggesting decreased mandibular growth [3].

Subsequently, our group further evaluated the effects of polyarthritis, pauciarthritis, and systemic onset JIA on facial morphology and TMJ joint form and function, and also facial and mandibular growth [5,6].  Mericle et al [5] evaluated 30 patients with JIA, 17 pauciarthritis and 13 polyarthritis onset.  We took medical and dental histories, intraoral, lateral cephalometric, and panoramic radiographs, facial photographs, and dental study models on these patients.  Measures of TMJ dysfunction were gathered during the clinical examination, and an index of condylar morphology was inferred from the panoramic radiographs.  The lateral cephalograms were traced, and data from 34 linear and angular measures used to compare the facial morphology of the two JIA onset types, both to normative standards and to each other.  As indicated by the higher TMJ dysfunction and condylar index scores, polyarthritis affects the form and function of the TMJ more frequently and severely, but so does pauciarthritis.  Moreover, compared to normative cephalometric standards, the patients with polyarthritis had small, short facies with underdeveloped mandibles.  Overall, both polyarthritis and pauciarthritis onset JIA have a negative effect on the form, function, and esthetics of the face and mandible; however, the effects were more pronounced with polyarthritis than the pauciarthritis onset [5].

Hanna et al [6] further evaluated 24 patients with systemic onset JIA to determine its effects on facial morphology and TMJ form and function.  The patients again were evaluated with medical and dental histories, facial photographs, intraoral examination, TMJ examination, lateral tomograms or panoramic radiographs, cephalograms, and impressions for study models.  The cranial mandibular index (CMI) was used to quantitate mandibular movement, tenderness, and TMJ noise.  Symptoms were measured by symptom severity index (SSI).  CMI data from the patients with systemic onset JIA were compared to a group of 24 children without JIA.  Our study indicated the facial morphology of patients with systemic onset JIA is similar to that of the healthy children except for a mild convex facial profile and backward rotation of the mandible.  Changes in facial form were associated with radiographic condylar abnormalities.  CMI scores and SSI scores of systemic onset patients were significantly greater than controls, and radiographic condylar changes were noticed in 29% percent of the patients with systemic onset JIA.  Our study also indicated that systemic onset JIA significantly affects TMJ form and function.  Facial form was only affected in a few patients with significant radiographic condylar changes [6]. 

A recent study by Vierucci et al [11] evaluated the incidence of TMJ damage and its consequence on the growth modality of the craniofacial complex in JIA.  They evaluated 120 JIA children’s TMJ anatomy and craniofacial complex by panoramic and lateral head x-rays.  Radiological signs of deviation in the condylar shape were recorded.  They found that radiological signs of remodeling of mandibular condyles were present in 60% of children, even though only 12% complained of subjective symptoms of TMJ pain or dysfunction.  Cephalometric angles between the mandibular body, and palatal and cranial base plane, indicative of vertebral growth pattern in a face, were also significantly increased.  The whole mandibular body assumed a more posterior and backward position.  The profile of patients with condylar dysplasia results in convexity and characterized by a short and retropositioned mandible.  The authors recommended early and close orthodontic supervision in all JIA children, even with no sign of TMJ pain or dysfunction, in order to limit the facial growth discrepancies due to TMJ involvement [11]. 

Another study by Schramm et al [12] evaluated 102 patients with JIA and introduced the Helkimo diagnostic index and Manley’s functional chewing test in to the diagnostic standard of their outpatient clinic, which improved early diagnosis of TMJ involvement.  A further study by Pedersen et al [13] evaluated condylar changes of the TMJ in 169 consecutive patients with JIA on orthopantograms.  They found that 62% of the patients exhibited condylar resorption similar to the previous results of Vierucci et al. [11].  The highest prevalence was seen again in children with polyarthritis onset and early age at onset.  Severe resorption was also frequent in these groups.  Patients with a positive ANA also had a high prevalence, but with a mild degree of resorption.  Overall, however, the bone resorptive process was mild [13]. 

Kuseler et al [14] evaluated 15 children with newly diagnosed JIA with radiographs and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhanced with gadolinium diethylene thiamine pentacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) and 10 healthy children.  The MRI variables included T1-weighted images before and after administration of Gd-DTPA with and without fat suppression.  They showed that MRI enhanced with Gd-DTPA indicated inflammatory activity in 87% of the patients.  Conventional MRI without contrast proved to be insignificant in diagnosing early inflammatory changes.  There assumption was that enhanced MRI is very efficient in diagnosing early inflammatory changes of the TMJ and is a more sensitive method than the clinical examination and radiographs [14].

A further indication that early diagnosis is indeed necessary was found by Silva et al [15] who evaluated 36 patients with JIA, 22 systemic onset, 7 oligoarthritis, and 7 polyarthritis for oral-facial evaluation.  They evaluated tooth decay, missing and filled, plaque and gum bleeding indices, clinical dysfunction, and mandibular dysfunction index.  Their study showed that the biggest frequency of tooth decay and gum bleeding in patients with JIA was associated with their TMJ limitation, indicating the necessity of frequent dental evaluation in relation to orthodontic evaluation for long-term care of these patients [15]. 

Recently, three papers have addressed possible therapeutic modalities in patients with early TMJ involvement.  Routine care has been orthodontic care, dental followup, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and monitoring peripheral joint involvement.  A study by our group, Ince et al [16], evaluated 27 JIA patients with polyarthritis.  Of these, 18 were receiving methotrexate (MTX) and NSAIDs, and 9 were receiving NSAIDS alone.  A routine physical examination including a detailed joint exam and a craniofacial examination were performed, which included a radiographic TMJ evaluation with panoral and corrected axial tomograms.  Radiographic evidence of condylar degeneration was apparent in 83% of the polyarthritis JIA patients.  However, the patients receiving MTX showed less severe TMJ involvement than those not receiving MTX.  A further study by our group also indicated that the polyarthritis-onset JIA patients receiving MTX showed less severe TMJ involvement than the polyarthritis patients not receiving MTX [7].  In the children with polyarthritis, the craniofacial structure was affected to a greater extent and overall there was a correlation between the severity of condylar lesions and cephalometric findings (mandibular retroposition, posterior rotation, smaller ramus, and mandibular dimensions) and the onset and duration of disease [7].  We found that MTX therapy was effective in minimizing TMJ destruction and craniofacial dysmorphology in JIA patients with polyarthritis onset [7].  Lastly, a study by Martini et al [17] evaluated a patient with isolated TMJ arthritis.  She underwent arthroscopic synovectomy followed by an intraarticular steroid injection.  They stated that these methods may reduce pain, improve jaw function, and prevent irreversible deformities. 

These studies have indicated that close followup and use of NSAIDs, such as naproxen at 10-20 mg/kg or tolmetin at 20-30 mg/kg, are indicated at onset.  The use of occlusal splints, can, also, decrease the force on the articular surfaces and thereby decrease pain [18].  The use of these splints is especially helpful when jaw clenching or bruxism is present.  However, the occlusion of JIA patients should be closely monitored since heavy posterior occlusal contacts can cause the development of an anterior bite.  It should be noted that the improvement of the occlusion does not always help or prevent the TMJ problem. 

It is possible that future studies may demonstrate that more aggressive medical therapy for JIA may decrease the frequency and severity of TMJ disease. For example, the use of intraarticular steroids or synovectomy [17], and/or the early use of methotrexate [7,16] may prove valuable in reducing TMJ dysfunction and pain.  Also, the early use of tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors may be helpful in preventing long-term TMJ deformities.

            In summary, inflammation of the TMJ occurs in a surprisingly high percentage of patients with all onset-types of JIA, especially those with polyarthritis. This TMJ disease may have major cosmetic and dental consequences. We recommend screening all patients who have TMJ pain or report any functional problems with limitation of jaw movement, especially restriction in opening.  The best and most cost-efficient way to screen these patients is controversial as noted [5-15]. We would suggest utilizing panoramic radiography which is available in many dental offices and provides an excellent image of the bony structures of the condyles [5-7].  However, articular fossae are sometimes partially obscured, especially if the patient has limited mandibular opening resulting in superimposition of the articular fossa.   Lateral tomograms provide a more accurate view of the TMJ.  They give a more detailed and accurate picture concerning hard tissue changes and the joint space of the TMJ than panoramic or transcranial radiography. The disadvantage is they are costly, inconvenient to perform, and the patient is exposed to higher levels of radiation than with other techniques [5-7]. Lastly, the use of enhanced MRI may be the most efficient method of diagnosing early TMJ changes, but may be cost prohibitive [14].

 

REFERENCES

 

1.Cassidy JT, Petty RE.  The juvenile idiopathic arthritides.  In: Cassidy JT, Petty RE, editors.  Textbook of pediatric rheumatology.  Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000: 214-321.

2.Ronning O, Valiaho M-L, Laaksonen A-L.  The involvement of the temporomandibular joint in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.  Scand J Rheumatol 1974; 3:89-96.

3.Ronchezel MV, Hilario MO, Goldenberg J. Lederman HM, Faltin KF Jr, de Azevedo MF, et al.  Temporomandibular joint and mandibular growth alterations in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.  J Rheumatol 1995; 22:1956-61.

4.Pearson MH, Ronning O.  Lesions of mandibular condyle in juvenile chronic arthritis.  Br Dent J 1996; 23:49-56. 

5.Mericle PM, Wilson VK, Moore TL, Hanna VE, Osborn TG, Rotskoff KS, et al.  Effects of polyarticular and pauciarticular onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis on facial and mandibular growth.  J Rheumatol 1996; 23:159-165.

6.Hanna VE, Rider SF, Moore TL, Wilson VK, Osborn TG, Rotskoff KS, et al.  Effects of systemic onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis on facial morphology and temporomandibular joint form and function.  J Rheumatol 1996; 23:155-8. 

7.Ince DO, Ince A, Moore TL.  Effect of methotrexate on the temporomandibular joint and facial morphology in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis patients.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118:75-83. 

8.Larheim TA, Haanaes HR, Ruud AF.  Mandibular growth temporomandibular joint changes, and dental occlusion in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a 17-year followup study.  Scand J Rheumatol 1981; 10:225-33.

9.Karhulahti T, Ylijoki H, Ronning O.  Mandibular condyle lesions related to age at onset and subtypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in 15-year-old children.  Scand J. Dent Res 1993; 101:332-8. 

10.Stabrun AE, Larheim TA, Rosler M., Haanaes HR.  Impaired mandibular function and its possible effect on mandibular growth in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.  Eur J Orthod 1987; 9:43-50.

11.Vierucci S, Simonini G, Tollaro I, Calabri GB, Cimaz R, Falcini F.  Craniofacial morphology in a cohort of juvenile idiopathic arthritis children.  Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: S217. 

12.Schramm I, Teuscher T, Witt E.  Involvement of the temporomandibular joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:S166.

13.Pedersen TK, Jensen JJ, Melsen B, Herlin T.  Resorption of the temporomandibular condylar bone according to subtypes of juvenile chronic arthritis.  J Rheumatol 2001; 28:2109-15.

14.Kuseler A, Pedersen TK, Herlin T, Gelineck J.  Contrast enhanced magnetic residence imaging as a method to diagnose early inflammatory changes in the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile chronic arthritis.  J Rheumatol 1998; 25:1406-12.

15.Silva CAA, Savioli C, Ching LH, Campos LMMA, Prado EFBG, Siqueira JTT.  Orofacial characteristics in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46:S238.

16.Ince DO, Ince A, Moore TL.  The effect of methotrexate on the temporomandibular joint and polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis patients.  J Clin Rheumatol 1999; 6:320-5.

17.Martini G, Bacciliero U, Tregnaghi A, Montesco MC, Zulian F.  Isolated temporomandibular synovitis as unique presentation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.  J Rheumatol 2001; 28:1689-92.

18.Oleson JP.  Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusions.  In: Orthodontic diseases.  St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2003:507-520.